Capturing user requirements is essential to good UXA user requirements capture is a research exercise that is undertaken early in a project life-cycle to establish and qualify the scope of the project. The aim of the research is to understand the service from a user’s perspective, and to establish users’ common needs and expectations.
The user requirements capture is useful for projects that have a lack of focus or to validate the existing project scope. The research provides an independent user perspective when a project has been created purely to fulfil a business need. The requirements capture findings are then used to balance the business goals with the user needs to ensure the project is a success.The user requirement capture project can include many different usability research methodologies including: surveys, structured and unstructured interviews, usability tests, and competitor analysis.
Typically, the research is undertaken on a one-to-one basis between a usability consultant and an end user, with an average user requirements capture project including up to 15 one-to-one interviews. Advantages of user requirements captureThe main advantages of a user requirements capture is the saving of time and money by validating the scope of a project against its users’ needs and expectations before any work begins.
This in turn mitigates the risk of the project launching and failing to meet its objectives (increased online conversion, registrations, visits, etc.). The research will also uncover critical information to improve the end result by answering questions such as; Is the current target audience realistic? Can the project be more successful with a different focus? And is the project worth investing in? There is also an important intangible benefit where the project team gains a deep insight into users and their needs at the very beginning, allowing them to remain focused on serving users throughout the duration of the project. DisadvantagesA user requirements capture will increase the time of the planning phase, which can be a frustration if the project team is keen to get cracking.
However, this time is easily saved later in the project due to making quicker, more informed decisions based on user needs. The research can also highlight a conflict in different users’ needs and expectations, which may require a user experience consultant to work with the team on making sense of the conflict and isolating a solution. As this method requires experienced user research professionals to ensure they capture true user requirements rather than unfocused conjecture and opinion, it can add an unexpected cost to the start of a project. ConclusionDespite the potential costs incurred early in the project life-cycle, a user requirements capture is an essential tool for any project which interfaces between the business and its users. Understanding user needs and requirements at the beginning of the project helps ensure the product is fully adopted by its users, leading to business success, and in more extreme cases a user requirements capture can save a business from investing time and money in a product which is not required by the target audience.You may also like.
Gathering Requirements From All PartiesTechniques involving visualization of the requirements like storyboards, prototypes, scenarios are helpful when you have a business user who may not be worried about the ins and outs of technical solution or have long attention duration for legalizing the requirements with users to let the analyst drive his discovery efficiently than just reading a document with a prospective user.from one project to another. Some techniques may prove highly beneficial for you in one project but may not be as productive in the other project or for some other company. Therefore the usefulness of a technique is determined by its need and the kind of advantages it offers in a particular project. There are 10 essential requirement gathering techniques that you must be aware of in order to manage the projects in a better way and run your business successfully are:. Document Analysis. Focus Group.
Interface Analysis. Interview. Observation. Prototyping. Requirements Workshop.
Reverse Engineering. Survey1. It is utilized in requirements elicitation to gather good number of ideas from a group of people. Usually brainstorming is used in identifying all possible solutions to problems and simplifies the detail of opportunities. It casts a broad net, determining various discreet possibilities.
Prioritization of such possibilities is vital to locate needles in haystack. Document AnalysisDocument Analysis is an important gathering technique. Evaluating the documentation of a present system can assist when making AS-IS process documents and also when driving the gap analysis for scoping of the migration projects. In today’s world, you will also be determining the requirements that drove making of an existing system- a beginning point for documenting all current requirements.
Chunks of information are mostly buried in present documents that assist you in putting questions as a part of validating the requirement completeness. Focus GroupA focus group is actually gathering of people who are customers or users representatives for a product to gain its feedback. The feedback can be collected about opportunities, needs, and problems to determine requirements or it can be collected to refine and validate the already elicited requirements. This type of market research is different from brainstorming in which it is a managed process with particular participants. There is a risk in following the crowd and some people think that focus groups are at best unproductive. One danger that we usually end up with is with least common denominator features.
Interface AnalysisInterface for any software product will either be human or machine. Integration with external devices and systems is another interface. The user centric design approaches are quite effective to ensure that you make usable software. Interface analysis- analyzing the touch points with another external system- is vital to ensure that you do not overlook requirements that are not instantly visible to the users. InterviewInterviews of users and stakeholders are important in creating wonderful software. Without knowing the expectations and goal of the stakeholders and users, you are highly unlikely to satiate them. You also have to understand the perspective of every interviewee, in order to properly address and weigh their inputs.
Like a good reporter, listening is a quality that assists an excellent analyst to gain better value through an interview as compared to an average analyst. The observation covers the study of users in its natural habitat. By watching users, a process flow, pain points, awkward steps and opportunities can be determined by an analyst for improvement. Observation can either be passive or active. Passive observation is provides better feedback to refine requirements on the same hand active observation works best for obtaining an understanding over an existing business process.
You can use any of these approaches to uncover the implicit requirements that are often overlooked. PrototypingPrototyping can be very helpful at gathering feedback. Low fidelity prototypes make a good listening tool. Many a times, people are not able to articulate a specific need in the abstract.
They can swiftly review whether a design approach would satisfy the need. Prototypes are very effectively done with fast sketches of storyboards and interfaces. Prototypes in some situations are also used as official requirements.
Requirements WorkshopPopularly known as JAD or joint application design, these workshops can be efficient for The requirements workshops are more organized and structured than a brainstorming session where the involved parties get together to document requirements. Creation of domain model artifacts like activity programs or static diagrams is one of the ways to capture the collaboration. A workshop with two analysts is more effective than one in which on works as a facilitator and the other scribes the work together. Reverse EngineeringIs this a last resort or starting point?
When a migration project is not having enough documentation of the current system, reverse engineering will determine what system does? It will not determine what the thing went wrong with the system and what a system must do? SurveyWhen gathering information from many people: to many to interview with time constraints and less budget: a questionnaire survey can be used. The surveyinsists the users to choose from the given options agree / disagree or rate something. Do not think that you can make a survey on your own but try to add meaningful insight in it. A well designed survey must give qualitative guidance for characterizing the market.
It should not be utilized for prioritizing of or features.